The Applicability of CALL in Teaching EFL Based on Sudanese Universities Teachers’ Attitudes

Amir Mohammed Albloly, Tag Elsir Hassan Bashoum El-Amin

Abstract


This research article tackles “the applicability of CALL in teaching EFL based on Sudanese EFL teachers’ attitudes”. The researchers utilized quantitative and experimental methods using two data gathering tools for the study in question: The first is the questionnaire
is administered to (50) different EFL Sudanese universities and colleges teachers, and
second one is pre and post-tests given to an experimental group consisting of (30) students of English in the second year selected from the Department of English in the Faculty
Education at the University of Kassala; they were taught reading comprehension lessons through the use of computers. The data obtained from the questionnaire and the two
have been computationally processed with the SPSS program to check the truth
hypotheses, to reflect the Sudanese EFL teachers’ perceptions towards the integration
CALL in teaching EFL and to see to what an extent there is a significant impact
integration of CALL on the students’ performance. Finally, Sudanese EFL teachers through this study recommend strongly the ultimate integration of CALL in teaching EFL.

Keywords


CALL; EFL Sudanese Teachers; EFL Teaching

Full Text:

PDF

References


Andrews, R. (2003). Where next to research on ICT and literacies? English in Education. 37(3), 28-41. Retrieved February 18, 2008, from http://www3.interscience.wiley.comljournal/ I 198231 29/abstract. Albion, P. R. (1999). Self-efficacy beliefs as an indicator of teachers' preparedness for teaching with technology. Paper presented at the 1999 annual Society for Information Technology in Teacher Education Conference, San Antonio, TX. Asan, A. (2003). Computer Technology Awareness by Elementary School Teachers: A Case Study from Turkey. Journal of Information Technology Education, 2, 150-163. Baker, E., Gearhart, M., & Hennan, J. (1990). The Apple Classrooms of tomorrow: 1990 UCLA evaluation study (Report to Apple Computer). Los Angeles: UCLA Center for the Study of Evaluation. Barron, 1, & Goldman, E. (1994). Technology and education reform: The reality behind the promise. In B. Means (Ed.), Integrating technology with teacher preparation (pp.81110). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Becker, H. (2000). Findings from the teaching, learning, and computing survey: Is Larry Cuban right? Revision of paper written for the School Technology Leadership Conference of the Council of Chief State School Officers, Washington, DC. Blamires, M. (1999). Developing literacy. In M. Blamires (Ed.), Enabling technologies for Inclusion (pp. 27-34). London: Paul Chapman. Berson, M. J. (1996). The effectiveness of computer technology in the social studies: A review of the literature. Journal of Research and Computing in Education, 28(4), 486-489.

Blake, Robert, J. (2008). Brave New Digital Classroom, Washington, D. C.: Georgetown University Press. Cavas, B., & Kesercioglu, T. (2003). Primary Science Teachers‟ Attitudes toward Computer Assisted Learning. Ege Journal of Education, 3(2), 35-43. Clarke, Mark A. & Silberstein, S. (1987) "Toward a Realisation of Psycholinguistic Principles in the ESL Reading Classroom", in Michael Long and Jack Richards (Eds.) Methodology in TESOL, P.233-247). Boston: Heinle & Heinle Publishers. Coley, R. (1997). Technology's impact: A new study shows the effectiveness and the limitations---of school technology. Electronic School. Retrieved March 12, 2007, from http://www.electronic-school.com/0997f3.html. Dwyer, D., Ringstaff, C., & Sandholtz, J. (1991). Changes in teachers' beliefs and practices in technology-rich classrooms. Educational Leadership, 48(8), 45-52. Francis-Pelton, L., & Pelton, T. (1996). Building attitudes: how a technology course affects pre-service teachers‟ attitudes about technology. Retrieved on 16 April 2004 from http://web.uvic.ca/educ/lfrancis/web/attitudesite.html. Erkan, S. (2004). An analysis of teachers‟ attitudes towards the computer. Manas University, Journal of Social Science, 17(12). Greener, S. (2009). e-Modelling - Helping learners to develop sound e-learning behaviors. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 7(3), 265-272. Ocak, M. A., & Akdemir, O. (2008). An Investigation of Primary School Science Teachers‟ Use of Computer Applications The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 7(4),6. Norum, K., Grabinger, R. S., & Duffield, J. A. (1999). Healing the universe is an inside job: teachers' views on integrating technology. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 7(3), 187-203. Richard, J. et al (1985) Longman Dictionary of Applied Linguistics. London: Longman. Roschelle, J., Pea, R., Hoadley, C., Gordin, D., & Means, B. (2000). Changing how and what children learn in school with computer-based technologies. The Future of children, Children, and Computer Technology, IO(2), 76-101.

Swenson, P. W., & Redmond, P. A. (2009). Online, hybrid, and blended coursework and the practice of technology-integrated teaching and learning within teacher education. Issues in Teacher Education, 18(2), 3-10. Teo, T., Lee, C. B., & Chai, C. S. (2008). Understanding pre-service teachers‟ computer attitudes: applying and extending the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24(2), 128-143.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 English Language Institute Journal