Effect of feeding urea-treated groundnut hulls (silage) and molasses during summer season on carcass characteristics of Desert lambs (Hammari subtype) under range condition

Abdelbagi Ballal Ahmed, Ikhlas Ahmed Nour, Ibrahim Musa Tibin, Omer Mustafa


The study was conducted at Elnuhood Desert Sheep Research Station, North Kurdofan State, Sudan, during late summer season; to evaluate the effect of supplementation of urea-treated groundnut hulls silage and molasses on slaughter weight and carcass characteristic of desert lamb Hammari ecotype. The duration of the experiment was 90 days, 60 lambs (thirty males + thirty females) of 6 months average age and 23.4 kg average  live weight  were divided into three equal groups(A,B, and C)  of twenty lambs(10 males + 10 females) each.  Groundnut hulls treated with 5 % urea (of its weight) was ensiled for 30 days. Animal in group (A) and (B) were offered a diet composed of 77% treated groundnut hulls and 23 % molasses, while Group C was un -supplemented (the control) . All the groups were left to graze in the same way practiced by the nomads in the area. Slaughter weights, carcass weights, composition yield and non carcass components were determined. Supplementation  had higher values for slaughter weight, hot  and cold carcass weight, empty body weight, gut fill weight, subcutaneous fat thickness, eye muscle area and dressing percentage but the differences were not significant (p>0.05) compared to  the free grazing un supplemented group( C control). Subcutaneous fat thickness, dressing percentage, leg and loin cuts, total muscle , total fat  and trims were not significantly different among the groups but the meat: bone ratio was significantly higher in group A (2.4). Group A had the heaviest cuts than group B and C. Non carcass components were not significantly (p>0.05) different among the groups except for empty rumen and reproductive organs. Wholesale cuts weights increased but not significant (P>0.05) with increasing the dietary supplementation. Body fat depots of the supplemented lambs especially group A was increased compared with the un-supplemented group which had thinner subcutaneous fat cover.

Full Text:



Besalem H, Nefzaoui A (2003). Feed blocks as alternative supplements for sheep and goats. Small Ruminant Research. Volume 49, Issue 3, September. pp. 275-288.

Cañeque, V., Lauzurica, S., Velasco, S., Ruiz De Huidobro, F., Perez, C., Diaz, M.T.,Manzanares, C., Onega, E., (1999). Engorde de corderos de raza Talaveranaen pastoreo o aprisco con distintos sistemas de alimentación. I. Efectosobre la calidad de la canal. XXIV Jornadas Científicas de la SociedadEspañola de Ovinotecnia y Caprinotecnia, pp. 433–437. Soria.

Carrasco, S., Ripoll, G., Sanz, A., Alvarez-Rodriguez, J., Panea, B., Revilla, R., Joy, M., (2009). Effect of feeding system on growth and carcass characteristics of Churra Tensina light lambs. Livest. Sci. 121, 56–63.

Cloete J J E, L C Hoffman, B Claasen and S W P Cloete ( 2012) Effect of production system on the growth rate, carcass characteristics and carcass composition of Dorper lambs , LRRD 24(6)

Delfa, R. Telxira, A. and Colomer-Rocher, F. (1989). A note on the use of a lumbar joint as predictor of body fat depots in Argones ewes with different body condition scores, Anim. Prod. 49:327-329.

Díaz M T, Velasco S, Caneque V, Lauzurica S, de Huidobro F R, Perez C, Gonzalez J and Manzanares C (2002). The use of concentrate or pasture for fattening lambs and its effect on carcass and meat quality. Small Ruminant Research, 43: 257-268.

Diaz, M.T., (2001). Características de la canal y de la carne de corderos lechales manchegos. Correlaciones y ecuaciones de predicción. Memoria paraoptar el grado de Doctor. Universidad Complutense de Madrid. 308 pp.

El Hag, F. M., Fadlalla, B. and Mukhtar, H. K. (2001). Some production characteristics of Sudan Desert sheep under range condition in North Kordofan, Sudan. Tropical Animal health and production, 33: 229-239

FAO (Food and Agricultural Organization) (2007). Experiences with urea-molasses multinutrient blocks in buffalo production and reproduction in smallholder dairy farming, Punjab, India. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Rome. pp. 59-70.

Field, R.A.,Maiorano, G.,McCormick, R.J., Riley, M.L., Russsell,W.C.,Williams, F.L., Crouse, J.D.,(1990). Effect of plane of nutrition and age on carcass maturity of sheep. J. Anim. Sci. 68, 1616–1623.

Idris A., Claudia Kijora Faisal El-Hag, Amir Salih and Ibrahim Bushar(2011) Effect of feed supplementation on the productive and reproductive performance of desert ewes in rangeland of kordofan, sudan. Tropentag conference on International Research on Food Security, Natural Resource Management and Rural Development

Joy, M., Ripoll, G., Delfa, R., (2008b). Effects of feeding system on carcass and non carcass composition of Churra Tensina light lambs. Small Rumin. Res. 78, 123–133.

Marai, I.F.M., Darawany, A.A., Fadiel, A. and Abdelhafez, M.A. (2006). Physiological traits as affected by heat stress in sheep. Small Ruminant Research 71, 1-12.

MARF (2010). Ministry of Animal Resources and Fisheries in the Sudan, Estimate of Livestock Population by states.

Mohamed, A. M. A. (2003). Body measurements, performance and meat characteristics of Desert sheep. PhD. Thesis, Gesira university. Sudan.

Njoya, A., Awa, N.D. and Chupamom, J. (2005). The effect of strategic supplementation and prophylaxis on the reproductive performance of primiparous ewes in the semi-arid area zone of Cameroon. Small Ruminant Research, 56:21-29.

Santos-Silva J, Mendes L A and Bessa R J B (2002). The effect of genotype, feeding system and slaughter weight on the quality of light lambs 1. Growth, carcass composition and meat quality. Livestock Production Science, 76:17-25

Smith, G. C.; King, G. T. and Carpenter, Z. L. (1978). Laboratory Manual For Meat Science. 2th edit. Howard Kemp. Print. Inc. Houston, Texas, U. S. A.

Tibin MAM, Bushara I, Eemam MB, Tibin IM and Jadalla JB. (2012). Carcass characteristics of desert sheep under range conditions in north Kordofan state, Sudan. Online J. Anim. Feed Res., 2 (5): 439-444.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Comments on this article

View all comments

ISSN: 243456

U. of  K. J. Vet. Med. Anim. Prod.